Skip to main content

Understanding Approval Workflows

Learn how approval workflows ensure content gets reviewed and signed off by the right people

Ben Gale avatar
Written by Ben Gale
Updated over a week ago

Overview

Approval workflows ensure that important content—like policies, risk assessments, or form submissions—gets reviewed and signed off by the right people before it's published or goes live. This helps maintain quality, ensures compliance, and creates an audit trail of who approved what and when.

Why Use Approval Workflows?

Without approvals, anyone with editing permissions could publish changes immediately. While that's fine for some content, critical documents like health and safety policies or risk assessments often need oversight.

Approval workflows give you control over:

  • Quality: Multiple reviewers catch errors or gaps before publication

  • Compliance: Regulatory requirements often mandate review and sign-off

  • Accountability: Clear records of who approved what and when

  • Consistency: Standard review processes across your organization

How Approval Workflows Work

Approval workflows use approval policies (also called templates) that define the review process. Here's the basic flow:

1. Create an Approval Policy

First, you set up an approval policy that defines:

  • Who needs to approve: Individual approvers or groups

  • How many stages: Simple one-step approval or multi-stage review

  • How many approvals per stage: One approval or consensus from multiple people

For example, you might create a policy called "Policy Review" with two stages:

  1. Department manager review

  2. Health and safety officer sign-off

2. Apply the Policy to Content

When creating or editing content (like a document or risk assessment), you assign an approval policy to it. This triggers the workflow when you submit for approval.

3. Approvers Review in Sequence

The workflow progresses through stages in order:

  • Stage 1 activates: First-stage approvers receive notifications and inbox tasks

  • They review and approve: Once the required number of approvals is met, the stage completes

  • Stage 2 activates: Next-stage approvers are notified

  • Process repeats: Until all stages are complete

4. Approval or Rejection

  • If all stages approve: The content is approved and can be published

  • If anyone rejects: The workflow stops immediately and the content goes back to draft

Key Concepts

Stages

Stages define the sequence of review steps. Each stage represents a checkpoint in your approval process.

Example stages:

  • Stage 1: "Department Review" (department managers)

  • Stage 2: "Safety Officer Review" (health and safety team)

  • Stage 3: "Final Sign-Off" (senior management)

Stages always proceed in order—you can't skip to stage 3 without completing stages 1 and 2.

Approvers

Each stage can have approvers from two sources:

Direct approvers: Specific individuals you name

  • Example: "Sarah Jones" (Facilities Manager)

Group approvers: All members of a team or group

  • Example: "Health & Safety Team" group (includes all team members)

  • Useful when any qualified team member can review

You can mix both types in a single stage. For instance, the Facilities Manager plus anyone from the Maintenance group.

Required Approvals

Each stage has a "required approvals count" that determines how many approvals are needed to complete the stage.

Examples:

  • 1 required approval: Any single approver can advance the stage (common for groups)

  • All required: Everyone must approve (for strict oversight)

  • 2 required approvals: Any two approvers can advance (for consensus)

If a stage has 5 possible approvers but only 2 required approvals, the first 2 people to approve will complete the stage.

Sequential Processing

Approval workflows are sequential, not parallel:

  • Only one stage is "active" at a time

  • Later stages must wait for earlier stages to complete

  • You can't skip stages

  • If any stage rejects, the entire workflow stops

This ensures proper review order. For example, there's no point in senior management reviewing something if the department manager hasn't approved it first.

When to Use Approval Workflows

Good use cases:

  • Publishing health and safety policies

  • Finalizing risk assessments

  • Releasing procedures or work instructions

  • Approving incident investigation reports

  • Sign-off on compliance documentation

When not to use approvals:

  • Internal working drafts (slows down collaboration)

  • Low-risk content like general notices

  • Time-sensitive updates (approvals take time)

What Happens During Approval

For Content Authors

  1. Submit for approval: You finish editing and submit the content

  2. Wait for review: The approval workflow kicks off automatically

  3. Track progress: You can see which stage is active and who's reviewing

  4. Notification: You're notified when approved or if rejected

  5. Make changes if rejected: Edit and resubmit if needed

For Approvers

  1. Notification: You receive an email and inbox notification when it's your turn

  2. Review content: You can view the content and any related information

  3. Approve or reject: You make a decision with optional comments

  4. Move on: The workflow automatically progresses to the next stage

For Administrators

  • Track all approvals: See pending and completed workflows across your site

  • Update policies: Modify approval policies as your needs change

  • Audit trail: View complete approval history for compliance

Approval Policies vs. Review Policies

Don't confuse approval policies with review policies:

Approval Policies (this guide):

  • One-time approval before publication

  • Triggered when you submit content for approval

  • Multi-stage sequential review

  • Approves or rejects content

Review Policies:

  • Recurring scheduled reviews (e.g., every 6 months)

  • Automatic reminders when reviews are due

  • Ensures content stays current

  • Reviews existing published content

You'll often use both together. For example, a safety policy might need approval before initial publication (approval policy), then regular reviews to keep it current (review policy).

Common Questions

Can I change an approval policy after creating it?

Yes, you can edit approval policies at any time. However, changes don't affect workflows that are already in progress—they'll continue using the original policy. New submissions will use the updated policy.

What if an approver is on holiday?

Assign multiple approvers or use groups so there's always someone available to review. You can also set required approvals to less than the total number of approvers (e.g., 1 required approval from a 3-person group).

Can I have different approval policies for different types of content?

Absolutely. You might have a simple one-stage policy for procedures and a complex three-stage policy for health and safety policies. Create as many policies as you need.

What happens if I delete an approval policy?

You can't delete a policy if it's currently assigned to active content or in-progress workflows. You'll need to reassign or complete those first.

Can approvers see who else has approved?

Yes, approvers can see the approval history, including who has already approved or rejected in previous stages.

Next Steps

Ready to create your first approval policy? Read our guide on Creating Approval Policies to get started.

For information about ongoing reviews of published content, see Understanding Review Policies.

Did this answer your question?